LOL!

Fahrenheit 9/11 Review in the Minneapolis Star Tribune.

Three out of four stars

The setup: Documentarian Michael Moore argues that President Bush used the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to benefit himself politically and his friends financially.

What works: Moore mixes fact and emotion very effectively.

What doesn't: He relies heavily on archival TV footage, which leaves him covering old ground.

--->Great scene: Congressmen run when they see him approaching.<-----

Rating: R for graphic images of war, language.

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HaHaHaHa! Run little moron congress people! Run!

Gaggle of Cockmasters

Check This gaggle of cockmasters bashing on Fahrenheit 9/11. They seem more concerned with how fat Mike Moore is than the actual content of the film. This was my reply to the gaggle of cockmasters.
-------------------------------------
I am a fellow who would fall just left of center, so I could be a bit biased in my opinion.

But, I have yet to hear a solid aurguement against the content in the film from those who oppose it. So far I've read or heard....

*Bag of hot air
*Unpatriotic
*Fat
*Fat liar
*Disloyalty to his country
*Copyright issues with the film name
*Self image issues
*A 1/2 hour hunger strike
*Full of `bovine fecal matter`

After all of this I have yet to hear anything that actully has to do with the content of the film and has more to do with Mike's weight and mouth.

This coming from those who have more than likely not even seen the film yet. That is unless you caught the first showing 1 1/2 hours ago and are posting from the theater with a wireless connection via laptop.

This brings into question who is really a "bag of hot air", "a liar" or who really is bashing on who due to "self image issues".

Come back when you have something intelligent to say.